It is possible to compute equivalent aperture by multiplying the lens aperture by the crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier). The essential physical specifications of the two cameras, as well as a larger range of comparable cameras, are summarized in the table below. To show and compare another camera pair, you may use the CAM-parator app, which allows you to choose your camera combination from among a vast number of available possibilities. The following is a comparison of the rear view sizes of the Olympus TG-6 with the Olympus TG-4. The front view size comparison of the Olympus TG-6 and the Olympus TG-4 is shown in the table below. On the other side, it is 1mm wider and 1mm thicker than the Olympus TG-4, with a width of 113mm and a thickness of 32mm, respectively, compared to the Olympus TG-4.
Enter the diagonal size of your screen.
The Olympus TG-6 is a modern model that is now available in the company’s current product line-up. The TG-4, on the other hand, has been phased out of production (but can be found pre-owned on ebay). The Olympus TG-4 was replaced by the Olympus TG-5, which was part of the same family of cameras as the TG-4.
Crop Factor is an acronym Olympus Tough TG 6 and Olympus Tough TG 4 that stands for Crop Factor.
When printing with the Olympus TG-6, the appropriate dimensions are 20 by 15 inches (50.8 by 38.9 centimeters) for good quality, 16 by 12 inches (40.6 x 30.5 cm) for very good quality, and 13 by 10 inches (33.9 by 25.4 centimeters) for exceptional quality prints. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, considering that we consider the TG-5 to be the greatest waterproof camera, one of the best cameras for kids, and the best camera with GPS, among other things. It’s true what they say about not fixing something that is not broken – and as you can see in our video review below, you’d have to travel a long way to break this camera. The greater the pixel pitch, the greater the distance between them and the greater the size of each pixel. Generally speaking, larger pixels provide a higher signal to noise ratio and a wider dynamic range.
Find out whether the two cameras are among the best in the business in the most recent Best Travel-Zoom Camera ranking, which is updated weekly. The TG-6, in terms of technology, has a more sophisticated image processing engine than the TG-4, which provides advantages in terms of noise reduction, color accuracy, and processing speed. The Olympus TG-6 is equipped with a 12.0MP (1/2.) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and the TruePic VIII image processing engine. The Olympus TG-4, on the other hand, has a 16.0MP (1/2.) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and is equipped with the TruePic VII processor. The LCD panels of the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus TG-4 have the same diagonal dimension of 3.00 inches “…..
Both cameras feature a telephoto lens with a reach of 100mm and a maximum aperture of f4.90 at this focal length, which is identical. Unfortunately, both cameras have fixed displays, which means that they cannot be tilted or flipped in any way. Another consideration is weight, which is particularly significant when choosing a camera that you will be carrying about with you all day. Despite the fact that the Olympus TG-4 is 6 grams lighter than the Olympus TG-6, we do not believe that this will make a substantial impact. First, let us take a quick look at the most important characteristics of the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus TG-4 before moving on to our more in-depth comparison.
We’re comparing the Olympus TG-4 and the Olympus TG-6, both of which are waterproof digital cameras produced by Olympus and are comparable in price. Although there is a significant variation in the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 and the TG-6, all cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3 inch) and the same sensor resolution “If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected]. The table below gives a synthesis of the camera evaluations provided by some of the most well-known photo-gear review sites on the internet (amateurphotographer , cameralabs , digitalcameraworld , dpreview , ephotozine , photographyblog ). As can be seen, the expert reviewers generally agree on the overall quality of various cameras, although their ratings may vary in certain instances, emphasizing the previous argument that choosing a camera is typically a highly personal decision. Larger sensors are more effective since they have a larger surface area for capturing light than smaller sensors. When comparing digital cameras, the generation of the camera is also a crucial thing to consider.
Despite the fact that we haven’t concluded our assessment of the Olympus TG-6, we have a large number of sample photographs and a hands-on report to share with you. Even at the lowest ISO setting, there is significant noise reduction; there is no continuous RAW picture recording; and the video performance is disappointing. With a focal length of 25mm, both cameras provide a wide angle coverage and have the same maximum aperture of f2.00 at this focal length.
Color depth (“DXO Portrait”), dynamic range (“DXO Landscape”), and low-light sensitivity (“DXO Sports”) of camera sensors are all evaluated and scored by this service. An overall camera score is also published by this service. An overview of the physical sensor parameters, as well as the results of the DXO sensor quality testing, is provided in the accompanying table for a selection of comparator-cameras. Because the sensor sizes of the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus TG-4 are the identical, they will enable the same amount of control over depth of field when utilized with the same focal length and aperture settings. For its part, because to its bigger pixel area (which is 32% more than that of the Olympus TG-4), the Olympus TG-6 is capable of capturing more light on the pixel level and producing photos with less noise in low light and high ISO conditions.
Additional Comparisons of the Olympus Tg
When the size of the pixel is increased, the amount of light that can be gathered by that pixel increases. The size of the sensor is typically considered to be a reliable measure of the quality of the camera. As a general rule, the larger the sensor, the higher the quality of the images captured. When it comes to storing image data, both the TG-4 and the TG-6 write their files on SDXC memory cards. Both cameras are compatible with UHS-I cards, which allow for ultra-fast data transmission rates of up to 104 MB/s when using the cards. Please keep in mind that the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens that you are using at the time of the shoot.
The Olympus website has further information on the two cameras (including user guides and manuals) as well as associated accessories. Both the Olympus TG-4 and the Olympus TG-6 cameras are equipped with an intervalometer. In this way, the photographer may shoot time lapse sequences of natural phenomena such as flower blossoming and sunsets and moon rises without the need to invest in an additional camera trigger and associated software. It is possible to charge the battery packs of both cameras using a USB cable, which may be quite useful while traveling. The TG-4 and the TG-6 have a portability rating of 90 and 90, respectively, based on their size and weight.